Collaborative Law – To Be, or Not to Be …

M. David Johnson - Denver Divorce Lawyer
Before attending the collaborative law training, I might have just chuckled a little and walked off in the face of these obviously sexist and hasty comments. But I attended the training and made the investment of two attorneys for two days to give collaborative law a fair shake – and a fair shake down. After two days of asking hard questions and being as fully open to the concept as I could, I can now say “bunk” to these preconceived, sexist and ill-inform comments.
Collaborative law is a valid and useful tool in resolving some family law cases. All cases should be evaluated as candidates for this process the same as we might evaluate a case for other tools such as mediation. I’m convinced that some cases will be better handled in the collaborative process rather than in litigation – not all, certainly, but some.
To my associates who think women fair better, I can say there is nothing gender specific about collaborative law. The process is completely gender blind. Men should fair just as well as women. I found nothing in the process which leads me to believe one sex is advantaged by the election of the CL process. I believe young fathers are particularly disadvantaged in our family law court system, in general, and I do believe there is a strong bias for young mothers. But I see nothing about the Collaborative Law process that exacerbates that inequity. In fact, I find the educational nature of collaborative law to be a powerful tool in bringing the parties to a common solution.
We have more to learn about the process and I look forward to it. This tool for resolving family law cases is here to stay for a reason – for some cases, this litigation substitute will help families survive the divorce process.

